You have just mastered HCF for two numbers.
The three-number version is almost identical — same rule, same procedure.
The one critical difference:
This sounds obvious, but it is where most errors happen.
A prime that appears in two of the three numbers but not the third must be excluded from the HCF.
In this section, you will practise the comparison table method:
| Feature | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Visual Alignment | See all factors at once |
| Systematic | No factor left behind |
| Error-free | High accuracy |
Let's get systematic.
You've just mastered finding the HCF of two numbers using prime factorisation. Now let's level up to three numbers!
'Common' now means common to ALL THREE numbers, not just two.
The trickiest part of three-number HCF is correctly identifying common primes.
A prime present in two numbers but absent from the third is NOT common.
Let's check your understanding with a quick diagnostic.
Three numbers have been factorised into their prime components:
Note the different prime bases ( and ) used across these three values.
For three numbers, 'common' means a prime must appear in ALL THREE factorisations — not just some.
Let's check each prime systematically.
Prime 2:
All three? Yes — common.
Prime 3:
All three? Yes — common.
Prime 5:
Prime 7:
So only 2 and 3 are common to all three.
The HCF must divide ALL three numbers. If a number is going to be a common factor, it has to be a factor of every single number in our set.
If the HCF contained , it would need to divide .
But has no factor of at all. So no number containing can divide . Including in the HCF would break the definition.
Now let's compute the HCF using the comparison table.
You need to take the minimum exponent across all THREE numbers for each common prime.
Here are the prime factorisations we're working with:
Common primes: and (these appear in all three numbers).
For each common prime, show the exponents in all three numbers and which one you choose.
Let me walk through the min-exponent computation for three numbers.
We have two common primes: 2 and 3. For each, we need the MINIMUM exponent across ALL THREE numbers.
| Number | Factorisation | Exponent of | Exponent of |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCF | min(2, 3, 2) = ? | min(3, 1, 2) = ? |
Prime 2:
Minimum of {2, 3, 2} = 2
So we take:
Prime 3:
Minimum of {3, 1, 2} = 1
So we take:
The key: you must compare ALL THREE exponents, not just two. The minimum of three numbers is the smallest of all three.
HCF =
Verification:
The HCF divides all three numbers. And it is the HIGHEST such common factor — you cannot find a number larger than 12 that divides all three.
Why is the right choice for prime 3, even though 108 has and 252 has ?
Because 120 only has . The weakest link determines the limit.
If we took , then 9 would need to divide 120.
But — not exact. So is too much for 120 to handle.
You've mastered HCF for two numbers. Now let's see if you can apply the same method to three numbers.
The Process is Identical:
The Key Difference:
'Common' now means present in ALL THREE numbers, not just two of them.
Using the prime factorisation method:
Show all your factorisations and working.
Let me work through HCF(60, 84, 90) step by step.
Factorise 60: . . . .
Factorise 84: . . . .
Factorise 90: . . . .
Now that we have the factorisations, let's organise them into a comparison table. This makes it much easier to spot which primes are common to all three numbers.
| Prime | 60 | 84 | 90 | Common? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | Yes |
Look at the row for prime factor 2. In 60, the exponent is 2. In 84, it's also 2. But in 90, the exponent is 1.
Next, let's look at prime 3.
| Prime | 60 | 84 | 90 | Common? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Yes |
In 60, the exponent is 1. In 84, it's also 1. In 90, it's 2. Again, because it appears in all three factorisations, it is common.
Now, pay close attention to the primes that are NOT common. This is where the 'all or nothing' rule for three numbers applies.
| Prime | 60 | 84 | 90 | Common? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | No (0 in 84) |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | No (0 in 60, 90) |
Prime 5 is in 60 and 90, but it's missing from 84. Prime 7 is only in 84. Neither of these can be part of our HCF.
Critical point: 5 appears in 60 and 90, but NOT in 84. Since , the number 84 has no factor of 5. So 5 is not common to all three, and it is excluded from the HCF.
If you included 5, the 'HCF' would be . Check: does 30 divide 84?
No! So 30 is not a common factor.
HCF =
All divisions are exact. The HCF is correct!